<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Cybersecurity on CyFun</title><link>https://cyfun.dev/tags/cybersecurity/</link><description>Recent content in Cybersecurity on CyFun</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cyfun.dev/tags/cybersecurity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Common info collection technique</title><link>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/common-info-collection-technique/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/common-info-collection-technique/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="introduction-"&gt;Introduction ⭐&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h3 id="who-are-these-adversaries"&gt;&amp;gt;Who are these adversaries?&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;They may be competitors, criminals, spies, unhappy employees, terrorists, or troublemakers. They may be motivated by money, revenge, or political beliefs, to name a few.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There are numerous ways adversaries collect information. Some of the more common methods include social engineering, phishing, accidental disclosure, googling, and dumpster diving. These methods are described over the next few pages followed by some basic countermeasures.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id="social-engineering"&gt;Social Engineering👪&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Social engineering is a collection of techniques used to manipulate people into revealing sensitive or other critical information. Those who engage in social engineering rely on the humans&amp;rsquo; natural tendency to trust. In fact, it&amp;rsquo;s often easier for an adversary to obtain information by simply asking the right questions than using technical hacking methods.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Social engineering is sometimes conducted by phone. The caller may pretend to be someone in a position of authority or a telephone or computer technician, gradually pulling information out of the targeted person. Often the adversary will call several employees and piece together enough information to launch an attack. Help desk employees are often targeted by an adversary because they&amp;rsquo;re trained to be friendly and provide information.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Social engineering can also occur through online social forums, at professional conferences, and at non-work social events, to name a few examples.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The first objective of an adversary attempting social engineering is to convince you that they are in fact a person that you can trust with critical information.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id="phishing"&gt;Phishing&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phishing scams may be the most common types of social engineering attacks used today. Most phishing scams demonstrate the following characteristics:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cybersecurity practices and why they are important</title><link>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/cybersecurity-practices-and-why-they-are-important/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/cybersecurity-practices-and-why-they-are-important/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="cybersecurity-practices"&gt;Cybersecurity Practices&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Incorporating cybersecurity practices into your daily life can prevent the disclosure of critical information (CI) to potential adversaries. If you&amp;rsquo;re thinking, &amp;ldquo;But I work in a control system environment; control systems don&amp;rsquo;t store CI,&amp;rdquo; then consider our definition of CI:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information that if disclosed would have a negative impact on an organization. It includes not only trade secrets and technical specs, but also sensitive information such as the process used by systems(e.g., commands and access points), financial data, personnel records and medical information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item><item><title>CySec Practices for ICS</title><link>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/cysec-practices-for-ics/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/cysec-practices-for-ics/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="learning-objectives"&gt;Learning Objectives&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As some of you may be aware, solid cybersecurity practices have a broad impact. It&amp;rsquo;s critical to include as many solid risk mitigation strategy as feasible into your daily routine. Cybersecurity methods are used in a variety of professions and situations, as well as in your personal life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://cyfun.dev/img/ics/cysecpracsbycyf.png" alt="cysecpracs" /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="focus-on-the-few-things-like"&gt;Focus on the few things like&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://cyfun.dev/docs/ICS/Practices/importantpractices"&gt;Describe cybersecurity practices and why they are important.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://cyfun.dev/docs/ICS/Practices/common-info-collection-techniques"&gt;Describe common information-collection techniques and how to protect yourself from them.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maintain integrity in secured areas</title><link>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/maintain-integrity-in-secured-areas/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/maintain-integrity-in-secured-areas/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is and is not allowed in a secured area, such as a control system environment, varies from organization to organization. This section will cover some of the most common equipment do&amp;rsquo;s and don&amp;rsquo;ts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="computers"&gt;Computers💻&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In many control system environments, computers that are not needed for control system operations are not allowed in the control room. One reason for this is that email, websites, and files from home are common sources of malware(viruses,Trojan horses spyware).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Methods to protect info</title><link>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/methods-to-protect-info/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/methods-to-protect-info/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h3 id="some-real-life-examples-of-poor-information-protection"&gt;Some real-life examples of poor information protection😝&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;h4 id="sony-20112014"&gt;SONY 2011/2014&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;h2 id="sony-was-attacked-in-april-2011-and-then-again-in-december-2014-they-failed-to-implement-recommended-security-controls-the-biggest-mistake-sony-made-that-led-to-the-psn-hacks-was-its-organizational-complexity-and-a-lack-of-proper-security-support-at-the-board-level-it-was-found-sonys-data-was-being-stored-in-an-unencrypted-format-and-they-had-also-failed-to-use-firewalls-to-protect-networks-they-were-also-caught-using-obsolete-web-applications-sony-said-in-2011-that-they-were-going-to-increase-their-security-but-they-never-did"&gt;Sony was attacked in April 2011 and then again in December 2014. They failed to implement recommended security controls. The biggest mistake Sony made that led to the PSN hacks was its organizational complexity and a lack of proper security support at the board level. It was found Sony&amp;rsquo;s data was being stored in an unencrypted format and they had also failed to use firewalls to protect networks. They were also caught using obsolete web applications. Sony said in 2011 that they were going to increase their security, but they never did.&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2 id="1-playstation-network-finally-allows-name-changes-first-one"&gt;&lt;a href="https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/ps4-name-change-1202975232/"&gt;1. PlayStation Network Finally Allows Name Changes, First One&amp;rsquo;s Free &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2 id="2-sony-has-sold-half-of-its-spotify-shares"&gt;&lt;a href="https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/sony-has-sold-half-of-its-spotify-shares-1202794230/"&gt;2. Sony Has Sold Half of Its Spotify Shares&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2 id="3-case-study-critical-controls-that-sony-should-have-implemented"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/casestudies/case-study-critical-controls-sony-implemented-36022"&gt;3. Case Study: Critical Controls that Sony Should Have Implemented&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;h4 id="jp-morgan-2014"&gt;J.P. MORGAN 2014&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the spring of 2014, hackers stole the login credentials for one of the employees at J.P. Morgan Chase, a leading global financial services firm. Those attackers then exploited an oversight&amp;ndash;the bank&amp;rsquo;s security had forgotten to implement two-step verification (2SV) on one of the network servers&amp;ndash;to gain access to J.P. Morgan Chase&amp;rsquo;s corporate network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following that initial intrusion, the attackers moved laterally across the bank&amp;rsquo;s network, gaining access to 90 servers in total. They didn&amp;rsquo;t steal any sensitive financial information before they were detected and blocked in August, but they did succeed in making off with the names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and other information of around 76 million households and approximately 7 million small businesses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="jp-morgan-chase-didnt-report-the-cost-of-the-breach-however-the-bank-did-announce-it-would-begin-spending-about-250-million-annually-on-information-security-and-employing-1000-security-professionals-to-prevent-similar-intrusions-from-happening"&gt;J.P. Morgan Chase didn&amp;rsquo;t report the cost of the breach. However, the bank did announce it would begin spending about $250 million annually on information security and employing 1,000 security professionals to prevent similar intrusions from happening.&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2 id="how-to-protect-your-business-from-a-data-breach--metacompliance"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.metacompliance.com/blog/8-data-breaches-caused-by-human-error/"&gt;How To Protect Your Business From A Data Breach | MetaCompliance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2 id="why-do-most-people-ignore-two-factor-authentication--hacker-noon"&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackernoon.com/why-do-most-people-ignore-two-factor-authentication-1bbc49671b8e"&gt;Why do most people ignore two-factor authentication? | Hacker Noon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;h4 id="deloitte-2017"&gt;DELOITTE 2017&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deloitte, one of the largest private firms in the U.S., which provides auditing, tax consulting, and high-end cybersecurity advice to some of the world&amp;rsquo;s biggest banks, multinational companies, media enterprises, pharmaceutical firms, and government agencies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deloitte, which is registered in London and has its global headquarters in New York, was the victim of a cybersecurity attack discovered in March of 2017. However it is believed the attackers may have had access to its systems since October or November 2016.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hacker compromised the firm&amp;rsquo;s global email server through an &amp;ldquo;administrator&amp;rsquo;s account&amp;rdquo; that, in theory, gave them privileged, unrestricted &amp;ldquo;access to all areas.&amp;rdquo; The account required only a single password and did not have two-step verification, sources said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="emails-to-and-from-deloittes-244000-staff-were-stored-in-the-azure-cloud-service-which-was-provided-by-microsoft-this-is-microsofts-equivalent-to-amazon-web-service-and-googles-cloud-platform"&gt;Emails to and from Deloitte&amp;rsquo;s 244,000 staff were stored in the Azure cloud service, which was provided by Microsoft. This is Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s equivalent to Amazon Web Service and Google&amp;rsquo;s Cloud Platform.&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2 id="deloitte-hit-by-cyber-attack-revealing-clients"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/sep/25/deloitte-hit-by-cyber-attack-revealing-clients-secret-emails#img-1"&gt;Deloitte hit by cyber-attack revealing clients&amp;rsquo; secret emails&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Physical protection of assets</title><link>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/physical-protection-of-assets/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://cyfun.dev/docs/ics/physical-protection-of-assets/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction🈂️&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The traditional physical security measures of “guns, guards, and gates” are no longer enough for today’s organizations. Many control system environments have effective physical security measures in place in addition to the traditional “three Gs” listed above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, additional measures could be the use of camera monitoring, electronic entryways that deny access to anyone without the proper credentials, and keypad locks. However, physical protection and control are also the responsibility of individual employees.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>